Global
Regulatory
Monitor
Real-time intelligence on the geopolitics of AI governance
Statutory Comparison Matrix
Select up to 3 jurisdictions to generate a comprehensive side-by-side analysis of regulatory frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, and compliance requirements.
Jurisdiction Tracker
Updated every 24 hours • Last sync: Dec 29, 2025
India
Active Reform
European Union
Enforcement
United States
Sectoral
United Kingdom
Innovation
China
Strict Control
Singapore
Voluntary
Gulf (GCC)
Sovereign
More Jurisdictions
Japan • Canada • Brazil
Coming Q3 2025
| Statutory Vector | Jurisdiction India | Jurisdiction EU | Jurisdiction USA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Architecture | “Harm-based (Ethics Bill 2025); Focus on demographic trust and sovereign data integrity.” | “4-Tier Risk Pyramid (Regulation 2024/1689). Mandatory pre-market conformity for High-Risk systems.” | “Sectoral Executive oversight; NIST RMF framework (Voluntary) with high-stakes litigation risk.” |
| Primary Statutory Base | “AI Ethics Bill 2025; DPDP Act 2023 (Algorithmic Privacy-by-Design mandates).” | “Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (The comprehensive EU AI Act).” | “Executive Order 14110; State-level consumer privacy laws (CCPA/CPRA).” |
| Extraterritorial Scope | “Yes; applies if personal data of natural persons within India is processed by AI.” | “Broad; applies to any provider placing AI systems on the EU market, regardless of origin.” | “Limited; Primarily enforced through export controls and sectoral consumer protection.” |
| Penalty Ceiling | “₹250 Crore per instance (DPDP); Criminal liability proposed in 2025 Ethics Bill.” | “Up to €35M or 7% Global Turnover for Art. 5 (Prohibited) violations.” | “FTC Enforcement; Massive Class Action exposure (Multi-billion dollar settlements).” |
| Innovation Stance | “Sovereign Compute (10k GPU clusters); Subsidized access for MSMEs/Startups.” | “Heavy compliance burden; EU AI Office-led sandboxes to mitigate friction.” | “Capital-intensive; Private sector lead; Strategic 'Silicon Sovereignty' defense focus.” |
Spotlight
EU AI Act Framework
Risk-Based Classification (Pyramid)
Unacceptable Risk
Prohibited (Art. 5)
High Risk
Regulated (Art. 6-51)
Systems in critical infrastructure, education, employment, or essential services.
- •CV-sorting for recruitment
- •Credit scoring
- •Medical device AI
- •Border control tools
Conformity Assessment (Art. 43): Mandatory pre-market internal control or Notified Body audit.
Post-Market Monitoring (Art. 61): Continuous analysis of system performance and risk logging.
Limited Risk
Transparency (Art. 50)
Minimal Risk
Free Use (Art. 69)
Key Provisions & FAQs
Compare Frameworks
Generate side-by-side analysis of divergence across risk frameworks, penalties, and extraterritorial scope. Now includes GCC and ASEAN data.
Asia / Pacific
India
EMEA
European Union
Americas
United States
EMEA
United Kingdom
Asia / Pacific
Singapore
Middle East
Gulf (GCC)
Asia / Pacific
China
Analytic Methodology
This comparison utilizes the AMLEGALS AI Statutory Engine to map primary legislative texts from Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the Official Gazette of India, and US Federal Register entries. Divergence coefficients are updated every 24 hours based on new jurisdictional advisories.