Statutory
Divergence.
"A world-class comparative engine designed to identify friction points between global sovereign compute mandates and civil algorithmic frameworks."
Republic of India
DATA PROTECTION BOARD OF INDIA (DPBI)
AI ETHICS BILL 2025 / DPDP 2023
European Union
EUROPEAN AI OFFICE
EU AI ACT (REGULATION 2024/1689)
United States
FTC / DOC / SECTORAL REGULATORS
EXECUTIVE ORDER 14110
| Statutory Vector | Jurisdiction Republic of India | Jurisdiction European Union | Jurisdiction United States |
|---|---|---|---|
⚖️Regulatory Stance | HARM-BASED; DATA SOVEREIGNTY FIRST. | HORIZONTAL; RISK-BASED CLASSIFICATION. | SECTORAL; NIST RMF FRAMEWORK LEAD. |
🧠Risk Philosophy | DEMOGRAPHIC TRUST & SAFETY | PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE | MARKET-LED INNOVATION |
🚨Penalty Ceiling | ₹250 CRORE PER INSTANCE | €35M OR 7% GLOBAL TURNOVER | STATE-SPECIFIC (CCPA) / FTC |
🚀Innovation Mandate | SOVEREIGN COMPUTE & GPU CLUSTERS | FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS PRESERVATION | SILICON SOVEREIGNTY & R&D LEAD |
The Union
Statute.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 represents the world's most comprehensive horizontal AI law, establishing a risk-based classification system for all neural architectures in the Union market.
Risk-Based
Approach.
Classification based on societal harm potential:
- Unacceptable (Banned)
- High-Risk (Regulated)
- Limited (Transparency)
- Minimal (Voluntary)
Mandatory
Obligations.
Ex-ante requirements for providers:
Technical documentation & Art. 11 registration.
Art. 14 meaningful human control mandates.
Data quality & lifecycle risk management.
Enforcement
Architecture.
Dual-tier oversight mechanism:
Central body for GPAI & systemic risk monitoring.
Member State bodies for High-Risk system vetting.
The Global
Hard-Wall.
Cross-border deployment requires high-fidelity statutory logic. This comparison engine utilized 2025 cycle benchmarks to map friction across the Republic of India and global sovereign data borders.